On July 30, 2020, the Government of Alberta announced that it will introduce a new oil and gas Liability Management Framework over the coming months. The framework is intended to accelerate the responsible reclamation of oil and gas sites and ensure a cleaner environment, all while improving Alberta's competitiveness to attract oil and gas investment.
Addressing the liabilities associated with inactive and orphaned wells, facilities, and pipelines continues to be a concern in Alberta. As the Government of Alberta notes in its press release, 456,729 licences have been issued to drill oil and gas wells in Alberta since the early 1990s. Of those, 96,969 wells are inactive, 70,785 are abandoned, 88,851 are reclamation certified, and 36,773 are reclamation exempt. Of the remaining wells, 162,530 are active and 821 have been drilled but are not producing.
The framework builds on the expanded role of the Orphan Well Association passed in April 2020's Bill 12 - Liabilities Management Statues Amendment Act, 2020 which came into force June 15, 2020, and amendments to the Orphan Fund Delegated Administration Regulation, Alta Reg 45/2001 effective the same day. The framework is being introduced as Alberta allocates $1 billion in COVID-19 emergency funding to closure activities through the Alberta Site Rehabilitation Program to support employment in oil field services companies and additional funding to the Orphan Well Association.
While few details have been released at this time, an early description published by the Government of Alberta suggests that the new framework will include the following key features:
At this point in time, the broad-brush measures described in the framework appear to be moderate steps and fairly uncontroversial. To an extent, the measures are also already at least partially implemented by the AER such as the enhanced review by the AER of a company's ability to manage liabilities as part of transfer applications, landowner nomination of sites for closure, and closure spend targets which currently exist under the voluntary area-based closure program and appear to be a common consideration as part of transfer discretion requests under Bulletin 2016-21: Revision and Clarification on Alberta Energy Regulator's Measures to Limit Environmental Impacts Pending Regulatory Changes to Address the Redwater Decision.
What is notable in Alberta's proposed approach is that Alberta will not be following British Columbia's approach of incorporating timelines into its closure requirements nor does it appear that Alberta is intending to increase security requirements.
The framework's potential effectiveness and impacts will become clearer once more details are released. In particular, the ability of the AER to enforce the changes and its ability to help companies maintain operations while continuing to address liabilities remains to be seen. We will provide updates as the framework is developed.