About
Offices
Careers
News
Students
Alumni
Payments
EN | FR

People
Expertise
Knowledge
Search
FR Menu
Search Mobile

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

View all

Full Name Person Search Button

Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all

Industries
Capital Projects Energy Funds & Finance Mining View all

Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management ESG Strategy and Solutions Governmental Affairs & Public Policy

View Client Work

International Experience

Expertise Name Expertise Search Button

Insights News Events Subscribe

Quarterly M&A Insights Quarterly Fintech Insights New Energy Economy Series ESG & the CIO

Business Law Talks Podcast Economic Outlook Class Actions: Looking Forward

Search Term

People

Practices

Industries

Advisory Services

Client Work

About

Offices

News

Careers

Insights

Law Students

Events

Search

Alumni

Payments

Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

Dylan H. Yegendorf

Associate

Associate | Email

T: 416.777.7837

Email

Toronto

Download vCard

Download PDF

Recent Experience
Insights, News & Events
Related Services

T: 416.777.7837

Email

Toronto

Download vCard

Download PDF

Education
Bar Admissions
Recent Experience
Insights, News & Events
Related Services

Recent Experience
Insights, News & Events
Related Services

Dylan Yegendorf has a general commercial litigation practice.

Prior to joining Bennett Jones as an associate, Dylan summered and articled with the firm. While articling, Dylan was seconded to the Enforcement Branch of the Ontario Securities Commission.

Education

University of Ottawa, BSS (Psychology), 2018, magna cum laude Queen's University, JD, 2021

Bar Admissions

Ontario, 2022

Recent Experience

Nickel 28 Capital Corp. in its successful defence of a dissident proxy solicitation by Pelham Investment Partners LP, including in the Supreme Court of British Columbia Supreme Court, which confirmed that the purported advance notice of Pelham to nominate directors for election at Nickel 28's annual meeting did not comply with the advance notice provisions in Nickel 28's articles.